Set your data boundaries.
We classify what can use external services, what stays local and what must stay out of the model. Passwords and keys always stay outside the model.
Privacy and AI strategy for your organisation. We define what your AI can use, where the data is processed and who gets access.
We classify what can use external services, what stays local and what must stay out of the model. Passwords and keys always stay outside the model.
For confidential work, we design local data flows. We review the whole path, from documents and models to logs, backups and support access.
Together, we define who can use which AI, for what purpose and for how long data is kept. A local server alone cannot replace these rules.
Cloud AI can be privacy-compliant too. The right choice depends on the data, the purpose and the assessed safeguards.
We start with your use cases, existing IT and privacy requirements. Together with the people responsible, we turn them into concrete decisions for rollout and operation.
Approved content, permitted purposes and boundaries your team can follow.
Local and external services with documented data flows.
Ownership, access permissions and deletion rules before rollout.
Explore the data classes, technical boundaries and legal requirements in detail.
Do not send data externally while its classification is unclear. Publicly available personal data remains personal data; pseudonymisation is not anonymisation.
In typical LLM inference, text is converted into tokens and numerical representations. This is not encryption. The processing software needs access to the content in a form it can use for computation.
Encryption in transit and at rest alone does not prevent access during processing. Special approaches such as confidential computing or computation on encrypted data use different protection models and require a separate assessment.
No training does not automatically mean no storage or no access. Tokenisation and embeddings do not automatically anonymise data.
To run an LLM locally, assess the entire data path: documents, prompts, responses, embedding services, logs, backups and support access. A local language model alone is not enough if other components send confidential content outside your environment.
Privacy-compliant AI requires an appropriate legal basis, data minimisation, transparency, data subject rights, permissions, retention periods and suitable safeguards.
Cloud AI can also be used lawfully. Depending on the use case, assess processor arrangements, third-country access and the need for a data protection impact assessment. We consider the GDPR, the Swiss FADP and sector-specific rules according to their respective scope.
Together with your IT and data protection teams, we define data approvals, architecture and operational responsibility: permitted purposes, local and external services, controlled data flows, access permissions and deletion rules.
Attackers use AI. Your security testing should too. For authorised penetration tests and code reviews, we use abliterated open-weight models with reduced refusal behaviour when analysing exploits and malware.
On our Swiss servers or at your premises. For qualified customers, with an agreed scope, written authorisation and prioritised findings.
Request a security review